Repository navigation
Show what picks leave behind and why each Jira key is there - #53
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This puts the data from #51 and #52 on the page. Feedback asked for two things: a warning when a picked tag ships issues that also depend on unreleased work elsewhere, and a clear answer to why a task shows up for a tag or a row.
Changes:
SHOP-38 → web: needs 1.9.0,SHOP-38 is blocked by SHOP-44 → admin: not merged,SHOP-38 → mobile: not in this report. A related issue with no changes at all that isn't done in Jira gets its status instead:SHOP-36 is blocked by SHOP-45: To Do. Changes already in production and closed merge requests aren't listed. Unlike the existing plan line, this works for hand picks and for issues that ship anyway, not only for ticked issues.named,linkedor both next to each Jira key, fromvia.from api !57, web !120.via_relation) get their own group at the end. Hovering a key shows its relations.blockslink shows up too. If that gets noisy, filtering by direction is a small follow-up.tagRowreplaces the inlinefindIndexinuntickMissed, because the new code needs the same lookup.docs/page.mddescribes all of it. Russian strings are added.Tests: four new browser tests cover the left-behind list before and after a second pick, the row labels, task sources, and the related group with the hover text. They failed before the change.
just lint-ci,just test-ciandjust test-smokepass.