Skip to content

chore(deps): update rust crate tree-sitter to 0.27 - #322

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/tree-sitter-0.x
Open

chore(deps): update rust crate tree-sitter to 0.27#322
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/tree-sitter-0.x

Conversation

@renovate

@renovate renovate Bot commented Sep 2, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Note

This PR body was truncated due to platform limits.

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
tree-sitter (source) dev-dependencies minor 0.26 → 0.27

Release Notes

tree-sitter/tree-sitter (tree-sitter)

v0.27.1

Compare Source

What's Changed

Full Changelog: tree-sitter/tree-sitter@v0.27.0...v0.27.1

v0.27.0

Compare Source

What's Changed

[!IMPORTANT]
✂ PR body was truncated to here.

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (in timezone America/New_York)

  • Branch creation
    • "after 3pm on Wednesday"
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@cla-bot cla-bot Bot added the cla-signed label Sep 2, 2026
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/tree-sitter-0.x branch from 9d2b4b4 to ab4ec0a Compare September 7, 2026 16:06
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/tree-sitter-0.x branch from ab4ec0a to f21b30f Compare September 15, 2026 19:01
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/tree-sitter-0.x branch 2 times, most recently from 3ac0214 to 7e67c3f Compare October 1, 2026 04:17
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/tree-sitter-0.x branch 2 times, most recently from 7972221 to 4cb43d7 Compare October 13, 2026 17:11
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/tree-sitter-0.x branch from 4cb43d7 to f829473 Compare October 18, 2026 13:09
@renovate

renovate Bot commented Oct 18, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

⚠️ Artifact update problem

Renovate failed to update an artifact related to this branch. You probably do not want to merge this PR as-is.

♻ Renovate will retry this branch, including artifacts, only when one of the following happens:

  • any of the package files in this branch needs updating, or
  • the branch becomes conflicted, or
  • you click the rebase/retry checkbox if found above, or
  • you rename this PR's title to start with "rebase!" to trigger it manually

The artifact failure details are included below:

File name: Cargo.lock
    Updating crates.io index
error: failed to select a version for `tree-sitter`.
    ... required by package `tree-sitter-rbs v0.2.3`
    ... which satisfies dependency `tree-sitter-rbs = "^0.2.3"` of package `zed_ruby v0.16.22 (/tmp/renovate/repos/github/zed-extensions/ruby)`
versions that meet the requirements `~0.26` are: 0.26.13, 0.26.12, 0.26.11, 0.26.10, 0.26.9, 0.26.8, 0.26.7, 0.26.6, 0.26.5, 0.26.3, 0.26.2

package `tree-sitter` links to the native library `tree-sitter`, but it conflicts with a previous package which links to `tree-sitter` as well:
package `tree-sitter v0.27.0`
    ... which satisfies dependency `tree-sitter = "^0.27"` of package `zed_ruby v0.16.22 (/tmp/renovate/repos/github/zed-extensions/ruby)`
note: only one package in the dependency graph may specify the same links value to ensure that only one copy of a native library is linked in the final binary
for more information, see https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/reference/resolver.html#links
help: try to adjust your dependencies so that only one package uses the `links = "tree-sitter"` value

failed to select a version for `tree-sitter` which could resolve this conflict

@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/tree-sitter-0.x branch from f829473 to 364a9d8 Compare October 20, 2026 18:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

cla-signed

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants