Skip to content

CHANGELOG: 1.7.0 — 2026-10-25 (pairs with engine v1.7.0) - #247

Merged
luisleo526 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/changelog-1.7.0-v2
Oct 24, 2026
Merged

luisleo526 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/changelog-1.7.0-v2

Conversation

@luisleo526

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Docs-only (CHANGELOG.md only): the ## 1.7.0 — 2026-10-25 section for the codegen release paired with engine v1.7.0, drafted from git log v1.6.3..main (#213 trade-history flag and export; #242 SEC846 promote-baseline hardening; #243 org CI canon), with the pairing note (regenerate C++ and relink against engine v1.7.0). VERSION untouched (release.yml writes it). Backfilling 1.6.2/1.6.3 is a separate follow-up.

Supersedes #246 (same entry plus REV-CX's fixes: the order-shapes receipt's host_reads now names set_trade_history_streamable for non-readers, so "Python and JSON contract" is reworded to "Python API"; UDT handles and security evaluators also use the escaped spelling). Drafted by TNX-CX; REV-CX GO at source.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Adds "## 1.7.0 — 2026-10-25" to CHANGELOG.md per the file's release note policy
(shape of the 1.6.1 section): compatibility and migration (exact pair with engine
v1.7.0, regenerate C++ and relink against the engine v1.7.0 headers and
libpineforge.a) and the three pull requests merged after v1.6.3:
#213 (the user-observable change: the strategy_reads_trade_history export, the
guarded set_trade_history_streamable constructor call for scripts that do not read
closed-trade rows, the qualified constructor host calls, and the larger set of
reserved names with their pf_safe_ escape, from the diff of 89b48cb and
docs/PUBLIC_CONTRACT.md), and #242 and #243 as repository/CI only. No backfill of
1.6.2 or 1.6.3 (follow-up card), no claim about the engine beyond its own notes,
VERSION untouched (release.yml writes it). CHANGELOG.md only.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@luisleo526
luisleo526 merged commit 22e6519 into main Oct 24, 2026
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant