Repository navigation
vfs: do not reuse the path of a loaded memfd image #67068
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
pipobscure
wants to merge
3
commits into
nodejs:main
Choose a base branch
from
pipobscure:vfs-addon-memfd
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+229
−15
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,60 @@ | ||
| // Flags: --disable-warning=ExperimentalWarning | ||
| 'use strict'; | ||
| const common = require('../common'); | ||
| const assert = require('node:assert'); | ||
| const { spawnSync } = require('node:child_process'); | ||
| const fs = require('node:fs'); | ||
| const path = require('node:path'); | ||
| const vfs = require('node:vfs'); | ||
|
|
||
| const addonPath = (name) => path.join( | ||
| __dirname, '..', 'addons', name, 'build', common.buildType, 'binding.node'); | ||
| const helloPath = addonPath('hello-world'); | ||
| const functionPath = addonPath('hello-world-function-export'); | ||
| if (!fs.existsSync(helloPath) || !fs.existsSync(functionPath)) { | ||
| common.skip('the hello-world addons are not built'); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const myVfs = vfs.create(); | ||
| myVfs.writeFileSync('/hello.node', fs.readFileSync(helloPath)); | ||
| myVfs.writeFileSync('/function.node', fs.readFileSync(functionPath)); | ||
| const mountPoint = myVfs.mount(); | ||
|
|
||
| const hello = require(path.join(mountPoint, 'hello.node')); | ||
| assert.strictEqual(typeof hello, 'object'); | ||
| assert.strictEqual(hello.hello(), 'world'); | ||
|
|
||
| // hello-world-function-export replaces its exports with a function. Resolved | ||
| // to the first image, this would be another { hello } object instead. | ||
| const fn = require(path.join(mountPoint, 'function.node')); | ||
| assert.strictEqual(typeof fn, 'function'); | ||
| assert.strictEqual(fn(), 'world'); | ||
| assert.notStrictEqual(fn, hello); | ||
|
|
||
| myVfs.unmount(); | ||
|
|
||
| // An addon on the main thread stays loaded and keeps the path it was loaded | ||
| // through, so enough of them leave no fd number to load another through. Loading | ||
| // has to carry on regardless, through the temp-file fallback. | ||
| if (common.isLinux) { | ||
| const limit = 128; | ||
| const child = ` | ||
| const assert = require('node:assert'); | ||
| const fs = require('node:fs'); | ||
| const path = require('node:path'); | ||
| const vfs = require('node:vfs'); | ||
| const myVfs = vfs.create(); | ||
| myVfs.writeFileSync('/function.node', fs.readFileSync(${JSON.stringify(functionPath)})); | ||
| const mountPoint = myVfs.mount(); | ||
| for (let i = 0; i < ${limit * 2}; i++) { | ||
| const addonPath = path.join(mountPoint, 'function.node'); | ||
| assert.strictEqual(require(addonPath)(), 'world'); | ||
| delete require.cache[addonPath]; | ||
| } | ||
| `; | ||
| const { status, stderr } = spawnSync('/bin/sh', [ | ||
| '-c', `ulimit -n ${limit} && exec "$0" "$@"`, | ||
| process.execPath, '--disable-warning=ExperimentalWarning', '-e', child, | ||
| ], { encoding: 'utf8' }); | ||
| assert.strictEqual(status, 0, stderr); | ||
| } |
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Doesn't this potentially implicitly close a pre-existing fd at
fd + 1?