Skip to content

Adding Configure Acquisition example in NI-Scope - #2249

Draft
NI-velmurugan wants to merge 2 commits into
ni:masterfrom
NI-velmurugan:users/velmurugan/add-niscope-configure-acquisition
Draft

NI-velmurugan wants to merge 2 commits into
ni:masterfrom
NI-velmurugan:users/velmurugan/add-niscope-configure-acquisition

Conversation

@NI-velmurugan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
  • This contribution adheres to CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • I've updated CHANGELOG.md if applicable.
    - [ ] I've added tests applicable for this pull request

What does this Pull Request accomplish?

This PR adds niscope_configured_acquistion.py, a Python adaptation of the LabVIEW niScope EX Configured Acquisition.vi along with the pipeline changes required for using matplotlib package.

What testing has been done?

Manually tested the example only using simulated hardware and the real hardware.

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines:
There may be pipelines that require an authorized user to comment /azp run to run.

@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Oct 29, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 75.18%. Comparing base (5375937) to head (13b4c17).

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (5375937) and HEAD (13b4c17). Click for more details.

HEAD has 11 uploads less than BASE
Flag BASE (5375937) HEAD (13b4c17)
niscopesystemtests 1 0
nidigitalsystemtests 1 0
nidmmsystemtests 1 0
nirfsgsystemtests 1 0
nimodinstsystemtests 1 0
nisesystemtests 1 0
niswitchsystemtests 1 0
nidcpowersystemtests 1 0
nirfsasystemtests 1 0
nifgensystemtests 1 0
nitclksystemtests 1 0
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2249       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   88.12%   75.18%   -12.94%     
===========================================
  Files          88       42       -46     
  Lines       22830     6633    -16197     
===========================================
- Hits        20118     4987    -15131     
+ Misses       2712     1646     -1066     
Flag Coverage Δ
codegenunittests 84.78% <ø> (ø)
nidcpowersystemtests ?
nidcpowerunittests 89.53% <ø> (ø)
nidigitalsystemtests ?
nidigitalunittests 68.43% <ø> (ø)
nidmmsystemtests ?
nifakeunittests 86.08% <ø> (ø)
nifgensystemtests ?
nimodinstsystemtests ?
nimodinstunittests 94.20% <ø> (ø)
nirfsasystemtests ?
nirfsaunittests 63.37% <ø> (ø)
nirfsgsystemtests ?
niscopesystemtests ?
niscopeunittests 43.20% <ø> (ø)
nisesystemtests ?
niswitchsystemtests ?
nitclksystemtests ?
nitclkunittests 98.26% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants