Skip to content

Adding Multi Record example in NI-Scope - #2247

Draft
NI-velmurugan wants to merge 3 commits into
ni:masterfrom
NI-velmurugan:users/velmurugan/add-niscope-multi-record
Draft

NI-velmurugan wants to merge 3 commits into
ni:masterfrom
NI-velmurugan:users/velmurugan/add-niscope-multi-record

Conversation

@NI-velmurugan

@NI-velmurugan NI-velmurugan commented Oct 27, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
  • This contribution adheres to CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • I've updated CHANGELOG.md if applicable.
    - [ ] I've added tests applicable for this pull request

What does this Pull Request accomplish?

This PR adds niscope_multi_record.py, a Python adaptation of the LabVIEW niScope EX Multi Record.vi

What testing has been done?

Manually tested the example only using simulated hardware and the real hardware.

The additional trigger type since this example is independent of the trigger type and the LV as well documented that it is avoided to simplify the VI, but adding this will let the user aware that they can configure any type of trigger instead of just the edge trigger
@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Oct 27, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 75.18%. Comparing base (5375937) to head (f9bc87d).

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (5375937) and HEAD (f9bc87d). Click for more details.

HEAD has 11 uploads less than BASE
Flag BASE (5375937) HEAD (f9bc87d)
niscopesystemtests 1 0
nidigitalsystemtests 1 0
nidmmsystemtests 1 0
nirfsgsystemtests 1 0
nimodinstsystemtests 1 0
nisesystemtests 1 0
niswitchsystemtests 1 0
nidcpowersystemtests 1 0
nirfsasystemtests 1 0
nifgensystemtests 1 0
nitclksystemtests 1 0
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2247       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   88.12%   75.18%   -12.94%     
===========================================
  Files          88       42       -46     
  Lines       22830     6633    -16197     
===========================================
- Hits        20118     4987    -15131     
+ Misses       2712     1646     -1066     
Flag Coverage Δ
codegenunittests 84.78% <ø> (ø)
nidcpowersystemtests ?
nidcpowerunittests 89.53% <ø> (ø)
nidigitalsystemtests ?
nidigitalunittests 68.43% <ø> (ø)
nidmmsystemtests ?
nifakeunittests 86.08% <ø> (ø)
nifgensystemtests ?
nimodinstsystemtests ?
nimodinstunittests 94.20% <ø> (ø)
nirfsasystemtests ?
nirfsaunittests 63.37% <ø> (ø)
nirfsgsystemtests ?
niscopesystemtests ?
niscopeunittests 43.20% <ø> (ø)
nisesystemtests ?
niswitchsystemtests ?
nitclksystemtests ?
nitclkunittests 98.26% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Comment thread src/niscope/examples/niscope_multi_record.py Outdated
Comment thread src/niscope/examples/niscope_multi_record.py Outdated
Comment thread src/niscope/examples/niscope_multi_record.py Outdated
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants