Repository navigation
Conversation
…ows orphans the waiter and its open request
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #647
Status
Implement: done (596/596 leasing, 2348/2348 changed) Review: round 1 + fix check passed (spec, code, claims: F0) Hardware: n/a Gate: running
Next: gate result
warn(step=grant) and granted on the next wake — the triage tests frombug/647-reproland in this PR and pass; deleting thecatchturns both red on the grant-stepwarnassertion, and acatchwithout the#deferturns both red onqueueDepthfinally; deleting them turns 40 leasing tests red, including the two triage testsAssumptions
warnmessage names the plan kind ("granting a provisioned device failed" / "granting a booted device failed") — matches the wording of the sibling grant-failure lines; no test or doc pins message text.Review
Spec review: 0 blocking, 0 fixed, 0 notes. Code review: 0 blocking, 0 fixed, 0 notes. Claims review: 0 blocking, 0 fixed, 0 notes.
Rounds: 1. Tokens: n/a.
How the reviews were spawned: this session sits at subagent depth and the harness refused nested spawns, as on #643, #644, #646 and #650. Each reviewer ran as a fresh detached
claude -psession — the body of.claude/agents/<reviewer>.mdas its system prompt, its model from that file's frontmatter — reading only the inputs directory from.agents/scripts/review-inputs.shand its own worktree of the reviewed commit, with no PR body, commit messages or another reviewer's output; each read.agents/briefs/calibration.mdfirst. Round 1 reviewed90d98d35; a format-hook rewrap of one test line forced a history rewrite, so a fix check (code and claims,lens: both) reviewed90780cc9and confirmed the delta formatting-only (F0 both). Nothing was reviewed by the agent that wrote the code.Written by an agent.