Skip to content

fastify vulnerable to header validation bypass via incomplete schema case normalization

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Sep 4, 2026 in fastify/fastify • Updated Sep 30, 2026

Package

npm fastify (npm)

Affected versions

< 5.12.2

Patched versions

5.12.2

Description

Impact

Fastify lowercases header-schema property names before compiling the schema, because Node.js stores request header names in lowercase. That normalization was incomplete: it lowercased only top-level properties keys and the root required array, and did not lowercase the JSON Schema Draft 7 dependencies keyword (its trigger keys and dependent property names) or names in nested subschemas. As a result, a header schema that uses dependencies to require one header when another is present (for example X-Admin requiring X-Admin-Token) never matches the lowercased request headers, so the dependency assertion is silently skipped. An unauthenticated remote client can send the header that activates a privileged path while omitting the header the dependency was meant to require, bypassing a schema-enforced security control. The header schema is idiomatic, valid JSON Schema Draft 7, and no custom validator, malformed request, or misconfiguration is required.

Patches

Header-schema names are now normalized across all schema positions (properties, required, dependencies, dependentRequired, dependentSchemas, and nested subschemas). Patched in fastify 5.12.2. The fix is also included in the 6.0.0 release. Header schemas referenced through an external shared $ref (registered with addSchema) are not reached by this normalization and now emit an FSTSEC002 startup warning; inline the header schema to keep case-insensitive assertions in effect.

Workarounds

If upgrading is not immediately possible, write header-schema names in lowercase so the dependencies and other case-sensitive assertions match Node's lowercased request headers, or enforce the cross-header requirement in an onRequest or preValidation hook instead of the schema.

References

@mcollina mcollina published to fastify/fastify Sep 4, 2026
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Sep 4, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Sep 30, 2026
Reviewed Sep 30, 2026
Last updated Sep 30, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(43rd percentile)

Weaknesses

Improper Handling of Case Sensitivity

The product does not properly account for differences in case sensitivity when accessing or determining the properties of a resource, leading to inconsistent results. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-84428

GHSA ID

GHSA-9q9j-q6p8-xq58

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.