Skip to content

fastify vulnerable to request body replacement via an async validation result collision

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Sep 4, 2026 in fastify/fastify • Updated Sep 30, 2026

Package

npm fastify (npm)

Affected versions

< 5.12.2

Patched versions

5.12.2

Description

Impact

Fastify runs a route's validator and, for a result shaped like { value, error }, unwraps it: an error becomes a validation failure and value replaces the request part. This convention is intended for synchronous custom compilers (for example Joi). A JSON Schema $async validator, however, resolves with the validated data itself, so Fastify applied the same unwrapping to it. If a request part validated by an $async schema contains a value property, Fastify replaced the whole request part with that nested value before the handler ran, so a value or error property in the payload was attacker-controlled. An application that dispatches operations from the validated request body could then act on data that never satisfied the route schema, leading to unauthorized state changes or disclosure. Reaching the vulnerable path requires the route to use an $async request schema.

Patches

Fastify no longer treats an asynchronous validation result as a { value, error } wrapper: an async validator's resolved value is used only to determine pass or fail, and it can no longer replace the request part or inject an error. The synchronous custom-compiler contract is unchanged. Patched in fastify 5.12.2 and 6.0.0.

Workarounds

If upgrading is not immediately possible, avoid $async request schemas, or perform the security-sensitive check in an onRequest or preHandler hook rather than relying on the schema-validated request part. Custom async validator compilers should signal failure by throwing (rejecting) rather than returning an { error } object.

References

@mcollina mcollina published to fastify/fastify Sep 4, 2026
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Sep 4, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Sep 30, 2026
Reviewed Sep 30, 2026
Last updated Sep 30, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(35th percentile)

Weaknesses

Improper Input Validation

The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-84504

GHSA ID

GHSA-667r-xxjv-c9mm

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.