Repository navigation
Fail Codecov checks on low coverage - #100
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Make the project status fail when a change lowers overall coverage by more than 0.1%, and the patch status fail when less than 95% of changed lines are covered. Both statuses were previously informational only. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Make the Codecov status checks fail instead of being informational only:
target: autowiththreshold: 0.1%, so the check fails if a PR lowers overall coverage by more than 0.1% relative to the base commit.target: 95%, so the check fails if less than 95% of the lines changed in a PR are covered.The updated
.github/codecov.ymlpasses Codecov's validator (https://codecov.io/validate).Notes:
maindoesn't currently seem to be recorded under PlasmaPy/pyfaradaycup on Codecov, and the uploads frommainpoint tonamurphy/pyfaradaycup. Until that's fixed, the project check may have no base to compare against. RegeneratingCODECOV_TOKENfrom the PlasmaPy repo's Codecov settings should fix it.🤖 Generated with Claude Code