Repository navigation
datasets(traces): add adversarial multi_agent_delegation trace - #107
Merged
emmanuelgjr merged 2 commits intoOct 28, 2026
Merged
emmanuelgjr merged 2 commits into
emmanuelgjr merged 2 commits into
Conversation
…sv and croissant.json after GenAI-Security-Project#104 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
emmanuelgjr
approved these changes
Oct 28, 2026
emmanuelgjr
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks, Divija. This is the first multi_agent_delegation trace in the dataset, and the notes on what the cited research does and doesn't support are exactly the scoping we look for. I rebased it onto main after #104 landed and regenerated index.csv and croissant.json. Your entry is unchanged. The entry has no contributor object; if you'd like to be credited by name (optionally with an ORCID iD), a small follow-up PR adding it is welcome.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What this adds
A synthetic example, in the dataset's trace format, of how a chain of AI agents can
be misled by forged text. An intake agent passes an outside party's claim to a triage
agent as if it were a verified fact, so a high-risk fraud case is closed without a
human ever seeing it.
It is data, not code: one new JSON entry plus the index and checksum updates that go
with it, so merging it does not change any software. Researchers and red teams can use
it to test whether multi-agent systems keep track of where each piece of information
came from. The entry lists each failure point span by span, with suggested mitigations.