Skip to content

chore: grant admin access to BravoNatalie on filecoin-encryption-viewer - #71

Merged
rvagg merged 2 commits into
FilOzone:masterfrom
BravoNatalie:bravonatalie/maintain-filecoin-encryption-viewer
Nov 11, 2026
Merged

rvagg merged 2 commits into
FilOzone:masterfrom
BravoNatalie:bravonatalie/maintain-filecoin-encryption-viewer

Conversation

@BravoNatalie

@BravoNatalie BravoNatalie commented Nov 11, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Grant BravoNatalie admin access on filecoin-encryption-viewer (upgrade from push to admin)

Why do you need this?

I maintain filecoin-encryption-viewer and need to set up its release pipeline. That needs a release environment with environment secrets (Settings → Environments → release). GitHub only lets repo admins create environments and manage their secrets, so the maintain role isn't enough.

What else do we need to know?

DRI: myself

Reviewer's Checklist

  • It is clear where the request is coming from (if unsure, ask)
  • All the automated checks passed
  • The YAML changes reflect the summary of the request
  • The Terraform plan posted as a comment reflects the summary of the request

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

BravoNatalie and others added 2 commits November 11, 2026 17:21
…-viewer

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@BravoNatalie BravoNatalie changed the title chore: grant maintainer access to BravoNatalie on filecoin-encryption-viewer chore: grant admin access to BravoNatalie on filecoin-encryption-viewer Nov 11, 2026
@rvagg
rvagg merged commit 9ba9dbe into FilOzone:master Nov 11, 2026
@rvagg

rvagg commented Nov 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Not sure why CI didn't run on the PR, but I've merged this and we'll 🤞 that the post-merge update runs, @BravoNatalie ping back here if this didn't work

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants