Repository navigation
Replies: 1 comment
|
Hi! I wouldn't consider a query taking 48+ hours instead of 3 hours to be normal Firebird behavior, but the presence of multiple Firebird processes does not necessarily indicate a problem. The first thing I'd check is the server architecture: Classic, SuperClassic, and SuperServer can have different process and resource usage patterns. Since a reboot restored performance, I would investigate what changed while the problem was happening:
I would avoid terminating all Firebird processes as a routine fix, since that can interrupt active transactions. Could you share the Firebird version, server architecture, database size, storage type, and whether the multiple processes were all associated with the same Firebird installation? That would help distinguish expected process behavior from an actual performance issue. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Hello everyone,
We have encountered a significant performance issue with our Firebird server. A query that previously completed in 3 hours failed to finish even after 48 hours. Upon investigation, we found that there were four active Firebird instances running on the server, none of which were heavily utilizing CPU or RAM. Additionally, suspicious subprocesses were observed, including those related to Windows Update.
The issue was resolved by terminating all Firebird processes through Task Manager and performing a full server reboot, after which performance returned to normal.
My question is: is such behavior typical for Firebird? Could having multiple instances or these external subprocesses impact the server’s performance?
I have attached a screenshot of the Task Manager for your reference.
Thank you in advance for your assistance!
All reactions